TALE OF A SCIENTIFIC CONVERT - REVIEW OF MARK LYNAS'S "SEEDS OF SCIENCE"

This is the age of big questions: Will AI dominate the world? Will we find a suitable alternative to fossil fuels? Will Big Data make us lose our privacy? And will Genetic Engineering (GE) and Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs) give rise to Frankenstein-like chimeras?

These questions do not have simple answers. They require a modicum of scientific learning even to appreciate all the implications. A person who has been fully educated in the arts and humanities may find himself or herself flip-flopping on the issues.

THE VISION OF GLOBAL WARMING THROUGH THE EYES OF LOMBORG – A LOOK AT BJORN LOMBORG’S BOOKS

A decade ago I read the book Earth in the Balance (1992) written by former US Vice President Al Gore. It talks about how “industrial civilization as presently organized, is colliding violently with our planet’s ecological system”

It details the gradual destruction of the world’s rainforests, of the ozone layer, of fertile agricultural land, of the climate balance and warns that things could only go worse. It left a significant imprint on my mind. What kind of world are we leaving our children, I thought to myself. This dismal mood continued until recently when I chanced upon Bjorn Lomborg’s The Skeptical Environmentalist: Measuring the Real State of the World (2001).

ROAD TO PERDITION - REVIEW OF TOM G PALMER'S "AFTER THE WELFARE STATE"

While the concept of "welfare state" is as old as Ashoka's reign, it is only in modern times that it has received renewed favour. In modern times many European countries such as Germany, Finland, Sweden, Norway, France, Belgium etc. have been classified as welfare states. In these countries government looks after health care and education and takes steps to bring down inequality among the people as well as root out poverty and unemployment.

Surely, this is a laudable, kind-hearted thing to do? Tom G Palmer's edited book After the Welfare State (2012) points out that there are dangers and misconceptions lurking behind this idealistic vision.

THINKING ABOUT THE POOR II – REVIEW OF SHAH AND MANDAVA'S "LAW, LIBERTY AND LIVELIHOOD"

In a previous blog post, I had concluded based on the randomized control trials (RCTs) carried out by Abhijit Banerjee and Esther Duflo and others (and summarized in Banerjee and Duflo's Poor Economics (2011)) that the "trickle-down" effect is probably not valid when we look at the very poor and that some paternalistic interventionism might be justified.

Here, in this article, which can be construed as a continuation of the earlier one, I wish to discuss further why the trickle-down effect fails to work. To do this we need to bring in a legal dimension that Banerjee and Duflo's work lacks. This dimension is well brought out in Parth J Shah and Naveen Mandava's edited book Law, Liberty and Livelihood: Making a Living on the Street (2005).

THINKING ABOUT THE POOR – REVIEW OF BANERJEE AND DUFLO’S “POOR ECONOMICS”

E M Forster once wrote, “We are not concerned with the very poor. They are unthinkable, and only to be approached by the statistician or the poet.”

While I am of the opinion that capitalism works well for most of society, can it really touch the very poor and destitute? To be sure, there are books like C K Prahalad’s The Fortune at the Bottom of the Pyramid (2004) which discuss how firms and corporations can reach out to address the needs of the poor and reap profits for themselves but that didn’t seem to be the complete answer.

Here I wish to talk about a handful of people who have looked at the face of poverty unflinchingly and come up with answers to whether capitalism actually works at the lowest rungs of society.

GOING TOO FAST - REVIEW OF THOMAS L FRIEDMAN'S "THANK YOU FOR BEING LATE"

Towards the end of his book Thank You For Being Late: An Optimist's Guide to Thriving in the Age of Accelerations (2016) noted journalist Thomas L Friedman states: "I am a socially liberal, deeply patriotic, pluralism-loving, community-oriented, fiscally moderate, free-trade-inclined, innovation-obsessed environmentalist-capitalist." Now that is a statement after my own heart! This is a kind of human being I could aspire to be!

TWO BOOKS ON EDUCATION - REVIEW OF "DISRUPTING CLASS" AND "BLENDED"

Clayton M Christensen, professor at Harvard Business School, shot to prominence with his book The Innovator's Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail (1997). In this book he first came up with the concept of "disruptive innovation" which has proved very influential in understanding business and technological trends.

A disruptive innovation is an innovation that creates a new market and eventually disrupts an existing market displacing established firms in the process.